The hardest part of hiring a marketing consultant is that you are being asked to judge expertise you do not have. If you could reliably tell good marketing advice from confident marketing advice, you would not need the help.
So judge the things you can assess. Here is what those are.
Most bad engagements are a mismatch here, not a competence problem. Someone excellent was hired for the wrong role.
| What you need | What it looks like | Buy this when |
|---|---|---|
| A pair of hands | Executes a defined brief. Writes, builds, runs the ads. | You know what needs doing and have no time to do it. |
| An adviser | Assesses, recommends, reviews. Does not execute. | You have capable people but nobody senior enough to set direction. |
| An owner | Holds the decisions, briefs the doers, says no. | Work happens but nothing joins up, and everything waits on you. |
Write down which one you are buying before you speak to anybody. The longer version of that decision is fractional director, agency or in-house hire. If you cannot decide, that is itself the answer: you need someone to own it.
Five, and the value is entirely in how specific the answers are.
A large following. It demonstrates they can market themselves to marketers. Your buyers are not marketers.
Percentage results with no starting number. “We grew traffic 400%” from 50 visits is 200 visits. Ask for the absolute figures and what happened to enquiries.
A client list of businesses nothing like yours. Consumer app experience does not transfer to a fifteen-person B2B service firm with a long sales cycle. The mechanics are different and so are the buyers.
Certainty in the first meeting. Anyone who knows what your problem is before looking at anything is selling you their standard package.
In the first month you should get more clarity than output, and that is correct rather than a warning sign.
That last one is the strongest signal available. If nothing you assumed has been challenged in a month, you have hired an expensive agreement.
Start with a small paid piece of work with a defined output. An audit, a positioning session, a ninety-day plan. You learn how somebody thinks and whether you can stand talking to them every week, which no proposal will tell you.
Avoid a twelve-month retainer signed on a first impression. Avoid payment purely on results as well, tempting as it sounds, because it pushes whoever you hire towards whatever moves fastest rather than whatever is right, and the fast things are rarely the ones that compound.
Three months, reviewed properly at the end, is usually the right first commitment for founder-led businesses. Long enough to see whether the thinking is any good, short enough to stop.
If you will not let go of the decisions, do not hire anyone to make them. Hire hands, brief them properly, and accept that direction stays with you.
The most common failure I see is not a bad consultant. It is a good one hired to own the marketing and then overruled on every judgement call, which produces exactly the scattered result the founder was trying to escape, at a higher cost. It is the same reason adding freelancers never fixes a missing strategy.
Most founder-led businesses are not short of marketing activity. They are short of a decision about what matters. The Founder-Led Marketing Scorecard takes about three minutes and tells you which of seven areas is holding the rest back.
You must be logged in to post a comment.