Ninety days is long enough to fix the things that are genuinely broken, and short enough that nobody loses interest.
Here is the plan I use with founder-led businesses that have marketing activity but no direction.
The first month produces almost no visible output. That is deliberate, and it is the month most businesses skip.
Stopping is the part founders find hardest, because someone is usually enjoying the thing you are stopping.
One channel. Not three, not a rebrand, not a new website.
Choose the place your buyers already are and where the founder is willing to appear personally. For most founder-led service businesses that is search plus one social platform.
Consistency beats reach at this size. A hundred of the right people who see you weekly are worth more than fifty thousand who see you once.
Not traffic. Not impressions. Enquiries from people you would be pleased to work with.
Ninety days is too short to judge search results, and long enough to judge everything else: whether the message landed, whether the owner had authority, whether anyone stopped doing the things you agreed to stop.
Ask one question at the end of it. Can three people in your business now describe who you are for, in the same words, without checking?
If yes, the next ninety days compound. If no, you have an ownership problem rather than a marketing problem, and no amount of activity will fix it.
No rebrand. No website redesign. No new channels. For the publishing side of it, one idea will carry a month. Those are all reasonable projects and none of them belongs in the first ninety days, because until the direction is settled you cannot brief any of them properly.
If you are weighing a redesign right now, this is the order I would do it in.
Most founder-led businesses are not short of marketing activity. They are short of a decision about what matters. The Founder-Led Marketing Scorecard takes about three minutes and tells you which of seven areas is holding the rest back.
You must be logged in to post a comment.