A founder asks me this most weeks. The website looks dated, enquiries are flat, and a redesign feels like the obvious move.
Sometimes it is. More often the website is not the constraint, and redesigning it is an expensive way to stay exactly where you are.
Imagine you have hired a designer and they ask three questions.
If you cannot answer all three, a redesign will not fix your problem. It will produce a better-looking version of the same confusion, and you will have spent the budget.
There are real cases where the site is the bottleneck.
Those are structural. No amount of strategy fixes a site nobody can update.
If your enquiries are flat but the site works, the problem is upstream.
Usually one of three things: the wrong people are arriving, the right people are arriving and not understanding the offer, or they understand it and the next step is too big.
I have written about the five reasons a site gets traffic but no enquiries. Four of the five are not design problems, and a redesign would have solved none of them.
Direction, then positioning, then the site.
Decide who you are for and what you want to be known for. Write the offer in words a buyer would recognise. Then brief the redesign against that, and the design decisions mostly make themselves.
Done in that order, a redesign is a much smaller project than it looks, and sometimes no redesign is needed at all. Done first, it becomes a series of taste arguments nobody can settle, because there is no agreed standard to settle them against.
If you cannot answer the three briefing questions today, spend a fraction of the redesign budget answering them properly. The redesign gets cheaper, faster and better, and you may find you need less of one than you thought.
Most founder-led businesses are not short of marketing activity. They are short of a decision about what matters. The Founder-Led Marketing Scorecard takes about three minutes and tells you which of seven areas is holding the rest back.
You must be logged in to post a comment.