Nobody can tell you what SEO should cost without knowing what you are trying to achieve. But they can tell you how the number is arrived at, and that is more useful.
Here is how I would think about the decision.
Start with two numbers you already have: what a client is worth to you over the relationship, and how many enquiries you convert.
If a client is worth ten thousand and you close one in four enquiries, an enquiry is worth two and a half thousand. Three extra enquiries a year covers most retainers several times over.
That calculation is the whole argument. If three extra enquiries a year would not cover the cost, SEO is the wrong channel for you and no agency should be pretending otherwise.
SEO invoices hide the fact that three different things are being bought.
Ask any prospective supplier to split their fee across those three. The answer tells you what they really do.
Rather than quote market rates, which vary enormously and date quickly, here are the three shapes I see.
Most small businesses are sold the third and need the second.
The cheapest way to waste an SEO budget is to rank for things your buyers do not search. That costs the same as ranking for the right things and returns nothing.
Before agreeing a budget, agree the terms. SEO for service businesses covers which searches precede a purchase, and it is a much shorter list than most proposals assume.
Most founder-led businesses are not short of marketing activity. They are short of a decision about what matters. The Founder-Led Marketing Scorecard takes about three minutes and tells you which of seven areas is holding the rest back.
You must be logged in to post a comment.